Monday, April 15, 2013

How are we getting beaten by Sioux City?

As our city council and RDA bumble and fumble along towards a crappy casino somewhere along the interstate, Sioux City of all places is enjoying 3 developers fighting over the chance to build a casino in their downtown. The decision should be coming this week.

The company behind one of the proposals, Penn Gaming, is currently operating Sioux City's riverboat casino. They're doing such a terrible job of it (sound familiar?) that the city has gone out to find a better option. Penn clearly doesn't get it, as they've submitted something along the lines of the truck stop casino our city "leaders" want to settle for.

The other 2 proposals are worth of Davenport's jealousy, and should make us wonder what the RDA and City of Davenport are doing wrong. Sioux City and its metro area are a fraction of the size of the Quad Cities, and have a far lower population within 100 miles than we do. They also have other casinos fairly close by, although not 3 in the immediate metro area like us. To be fair, the other difference is that their interstate is IN their downtown, so they can kind of have it both ways. That said, I don't see why we can't get something a little closer to these:

One is a Hard Rock Casino and Hotel, utilizing a mixture of new construction and reuse, in downtown Sioux City. It is essentially an addition to the historic Battery Building, as seen on the left. This brings the legitimacy of a national hotel and casino brand while also helping out a historic building.








The final proposal, and one that I would say is the best, utilizes one of downtown Sioux City's largest, and currently underused buildings, the former Warrior Hotel. It also would renovate an additional building next door.


The companies competing for the chance at this casino are publicly campaigning in a way that we barely saw with our casino competition. Some of them have even opened storefronts to push their plan, and have created videos like this one about the Warrior.


Of course, you could argue that we DID have a proposal that was as good as these, from Restoration St Louis, and you'd be right. So we have of course rejected that option, because heaven forbid that Davenport do the right thing lately.

5 Comments:

At 4/15/2013 9:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

interesting!

 
At 4/20/2013 5:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What does Davenport have that Sioux City doesn't? Malin. Enough said.

 
At 4/22/2013 9:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What does Davenport have that Sioux City doesn't? The RDA.

 
At 4/22/2013 6:37 PM, Blogger QuadCityImages said...

What does the RDA have that other non-profit gaming license holders have? A member that seems determined to do everything he can to stop Davenport from bringing in a successful casino development.

 
At 4/25/2013 1:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Get a new council or have a former Alderman deliver his "proof" of theft to the IA State Auditor to get rid of Malin. Neither of which will happen since that will casue someone to put some effort into it.

Davenport's problem is that there are too many looking out for their own self interst rather than to the betterment of the city as a whole.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home